Tuesday, June 3, 2008

Super Delegate and Delegate Controversy; Why are Delegates Voting for who they Think will Win Rather than who they Want to Win?

Super Delegate and Delegate Controversy; Why are Delegates Voting for who they Think will Win Rather than who they Want to Win? I have never heard of such a thing. It is spineless to vote for who you think will win rather than who you want to win and I won't support a party that actually celebrates this type of mindset.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Awwwwwwl doooone, Aless. It awwwwwl over. The dirty little untold secret is that MOST of them DON'T want Hillary to win. Payback can certainly be a bitch.

She started losing when Howard Dean became DNC chair.

She kept losing when Harry reid and nancy Pelosi took over Congress.

And now it's OVER!

Angry Chinese Driver said...

It's more spineless when you make random, unfounded accusations on some blog against Obama. If what you claim is really true, Hillary would've been the nominee AGES ago.

A.M. said...

A.G.D., what do you mean?

The statistics prove Barack Obama cheated in the Caucus states. it's also pretty clear the threesome of Barack, Edwards and Richardson basically combined forces to defeat Hillary Clinton.

That probably is legal, but to then give Barack even vote from Michigan is the height of dumbness. Barack benefited in Iowa by taking his name off of the ballot in Michigan, so it was SOMETHING VENTURED, something gained.

Instead the media has it mixed up, thinking that Barack didn't venture anything in Michigan.

Anonymous said...

You're a nutcase. Please find something better to do with your time than waste all of ours.

james said...

Well anon, technically the same could be said to you, no one is making you read his drivel.

A.M. said...

thank you, james.

I just don't want to see Barack fall too hard and too fast if they really get him thinking he's actually won for too long.